Weekly Pitch 2

The video and the feedback of weekly pitch 2.

Teaching Assistant (claretb)

Except the speed of video, everything seems fine for video style.

Clients gave some feedback on last week’s video, but it seems there were no meeting and questions from the team this week to receive more. I was expecting to see more feedbacks and learnings from users.

I can’t understand the idea behind prototype 2. How people create their own designs? If they create their own, which issue is solved by this prototype? I think it is already Smartibot and do you have enough materials and instructions like Smartibot?

Attachment idea sounds good, but we want to see something tested at this stage. There are some possibilities about its usage, but did you created attachments and tested them with the robot? How about your partners? Did they hear about it in a meeting?

Professor (jgrizou)

Felt at the edge of the speed conformable to follow what you say. It was a big hard to follow.

Learned from user

It felt more like a defense of your choices than an acknowledgement of what was learned. Can you see why I am saying this and the difference between the two?

Learned from prototype

Why would lower center of gravity = more speed? Just curious on a physics basis I am not sure it make sense or what you are trying to get to.

Prototype 3 felt interesting with the hole on the top of the head to be slided in

Feedback

I understand you picked the angle of smartibot mixed with Curio but I am not sure how feasible what you propose would be for another person to build.

What would be a good outcome for your project? Do you plan to offer the plans of the robot on your website? Maybe a tutorial on how to build it?

Overall, I don’t think you met with your client enough :slight_smile: , there is lot we could have discussed on a day to day basis.