A summary of the iterative process that team undertook from the start of the project to the final prototype
01
Research and Requirement Gathering
Smartibot Assemble
In the initial phase of Research and Requirement Gathering, we explored our client's needs in detail and the resources at our disposal, such as the Smartibot Kit, the cardboards as well as the servos. We started by assembling the Smartibot according to its intended design, identifying the features that could be integrated into our redesign. Collaboration was key in this process. We engaged in regular discussions with our peers from Team 9 and Team 10B to broaden our perspective and uncover potential features that could elevate our design. This comprehensive approach laid the foundation for our subsequent design stages.
02 Sketch
In the Sketching phase, we translated our research and requirements into tangible concepts. The fusion of brainstorming and creativity led to the birth of multiple design ideas on paper. These preliminary sketches acted as the first visual representation of our understanding and ideas, an amalgamation of the Curio robot's existing strengths and the innovative features we sought to introduce. This iterative process was crucial in visualizing and refining our design before moving to the prototyping stage. The galleries below introduces the various ideas that we had throughout the project.
Initial Sketches
With the use of the Autocad Software to help us visualise our ideas clear, the below images are the some of the sketches that were on top of our heads intially. These small random burst of ideas and possibilities would eventually lead us to the prototyping of the final design.
Final Sketches
Through the iterative process of sketching, prototyping, critical analysis and back to sketching, the team has filtered out the sketches with the most potential to become our final product.
03 Prototyping
During the Prototyping phase, our sketches came to life as we started crafting physical models of our ideas. Utilizing resources such as servos, cardboards, and the Smartibot Kit, we constructed working prototypes that embodied our innovative vision for the Curio robot. This hands-on process allowed us to test our design concepts in real-world conditions, revealing practical insights about usability, functionality, and aesthetic appeal. Each prototype represented an evolutionary step towards the final design, driving us closer to our goal of an improved Curio robot.
First Prototype
Our team's first prototype was a model of simplicity and practicality. We enhanced the original Smartibot design by integrating a supportive ledge at the rear. This added feature allowed the robot to securely hold a phone, enabling it to move with enhanced functionality. This initial prototype served as a straightforward, yet vital step in our journey, marrying the existing design with our innovative vision.
Second Prototype: Reliant Robin
Our second prototype took inspiration from the speed-focused design of the Reliant Robin, resulting in a sleek and fast iteration of our Curio robot. While this prototype marked a significant leap towards achieving our speed objectives, it revealed areas for improvement, notably an unadjustable camera angle and an unstable phone mount. These learnings became invaluable as we continued refining our design.
Third Prototype: Tank Design
Our third prototype, inspired by the design of a tank, emerged as a creative solution to address user confusion with the Curio Bot's orientation. With its innovative rotational top, the robot achieves full-spectrum maneuverability, rendering concerns about 'front' and 'back' irrelevant. The direction of the phone camera now intuitively defines the robot's forward path. Incorporating the high-speed motors from our Reliant Robin prototype, this design also addresses the speed limitation. Initial iterations featured 'teeth' at the bottom of the rotational top to enable dual servo motor operation. However, following a comprehensive critical analysis, we found this feature superfluous and streamlined our design by only using one servo to rotate the top. (Right Picture)
Third Prototype: Tank Design (con't)
Building on the advancements of the rotational top, the team turned its focus to refining the tank's base. We equipped it with wheels and integrated the Smartibot microcontroller board to imbue movement. The team faced a significant decision point – choosing between a four-wheel or two-wheel design. Eventually, we opted for two main wheels supplemented by two freewheeling support wheels, as our motor wasn't powerful enough to concurrently drive four full-sized wheels. We further enhanced the design by incorporating small servos into the rotatable top, allowing remote control of the phone's resting angle. The culmination of our efforts is reflected in the final design, as depicted in the images below.
04 Critical Analysis
In the final phase of Critical Analysis, we rigorously evaluated each prototype, scrutinizing our designs under the lenses of functionality, usability, and aesthetics. We questioned every design decision, pushing ourselves to justify each feature, material, and design choice. This thorough analysis enabled us to identify both the strengths and areas for improvement in our prototypes. Armed with this knowledge, we revisited our sketching stage, incorporating these critical insights into refined designs. The cyclical nature of this process helped us to progressively refine our ideas, fueling our quest for an optimized Curio bot.
The First Prototype
The phone mount lacks stability, posing a risk of the phone dislodging during movement.
The weight of the phone adversely impacts the robot's mobility.
Future prototypes should lean more towards the original Curio design rather than strictly following the Smartibot's layout.
The Reliant Robin Design
The motor's instability can lead to slippage, which can inadvertently alter the bot's direction.
The phone mount's angle is fixed and lacks adjustability.
The stability of the phone mount remains a concern, as it could result in the phone dislodging during movement.
The speed of the Reliant Robin is commendable, achieving a desirable pace.
To enhance its learning potential, the bot could benefit from additional features for interactive engagement.
The Tank Design
The speed concern has been resolved, thanks to the utilization of motors from the Reliant Robin design.
The innovative rotational top facilitates omni-directional movement, allowing the phone camera's orientation to determine the 'front' of the bot, alleviating user confusion.
The phone's resting angle is easily adjustable, courtesy of the integrated servo controls.
The bot now includes a variety of features, enabling students to undertake a wide range of activities.
The weight of the phone may still pose a challenge to the robot's mobility.
The tank's design, while robust, is somewhat bulky, which could impact its portability.